This week, Bloomberg Business released its ranking of the most innovative states in America and Massachusetts took the lead with California coming a close second. Having been in the real estate and financing business in Massachusetts for over 25 years, for myself and the team at UC Funds it came as no surprise that Massachusetts is still churning out the best and brightest. We see it in our work every day in the people we work with who strive to improve the quality of life for those who live in the greater Boston area.
In this article by Michelle Jamrisko for Bloomberg, Nariman Behravesh, Chief Economist at HIS Inc. had a lot to say about how much innovation has contributed to the state of Massachusetts.
The Boston area’s Route 128 eked out a victory over Silicon Valley, as Bloomberg’s ranking of the most innovative states in the U.S. illustrates how universities can juice local economies.
Massachusetts is the most innovative state, with California scoring a close second and Washington, New Jersey and Connecticut rounding out the top five states, according to the data compiled by Bloomberg. Mississippi, West Virginia and South Dakota are the three least innovative states.
“You’ve got these major, world-ranked institutions that have played a big role in terms of churning out some very, very well-qualified, bright people,” feeding an innovative atmosphere, said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS Inc. in Lexington, Massachusetts.
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Behravesh’s alma mater, is one such school that’s provided a ripple effect for the local economy, he said. MIT graduates have produced around 400 startup businesses over the past few decades, including Framingham, Massachusetts-based electronics maker Bose Corp., which then creates a “cluster” of companies that are attracted to the strong business environment and in turn propel the labor market and growth, he said.
“Innovation usually leads to job creation, and high-skilled job creation, mostly,” Behravesh said. “But there are other jobs that come with it, namely, that as the labor force grows, they need haircuts, they need landscapers, all that stuff — so it does tend to have linkages to other parts of the economy.”
Massachusetts was able to edge out California by 0.03 point, perhaps in part because high-tech density was measured via number of companies, rather than market capital. That meant that the world’s most valuable company, Cupertino, California-based Apple Inc., couldn’t lift the state to the top spot in the ranking.
No. 40 North Dakota, however, illustrates what happens when economic growth is concentrated in one industry. The crash in oil prices has hobbled the state and soured the business environment, which might have otherwise attracted more companies from other industries, Behravesh said. But states at the bottom of the ladder aren’t doomed to weak growth and a lack of economic vitality.
“There are some things that state governments can do to make their states more attractive to research and development,” including R&D tax credits, he said. “State governments — if they carefully target areas where they think they have a bit of a competitive advantage — they could develop a cluster around their universities, as well.”
The Bloomberg U.S. Innovation Index scored each of the 50 states on a 0-100 scale across six equally weighted metrics: R&D intensity; productivity; high-tech density; concentration of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) employment; science and engineering degree holders; and patent activity.
The data also show the limits of measuring healthy innovation. For example, the migration of talent across state lines can be difficult to measure and often captured only on delay, such as through U.S. Census bureau figures.
Daniel Palmier is the founding CEO of UC Funds, an investment capital solutions provider. He writes about topics related to Boston and commercial real estate here.
Read the original article here.